Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arma Partners

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:24, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Arma Partners

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP: no significant coverage, sources provided mention the company only in passing or not at all. – Steel 22:07, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Quite advery, plus it fails WP: CORP with no significant coverage by secondary reliable sources. Electric Catfish 00:07, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As ECF said looks a little too much like an advert (which can be fixed), however after a good search I can't find anything which indicates it meets the GNG or WP:CORP. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:37, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Despite being the original author of this article, I would support deletion as the firm probably does not meet WP:CORP yet and the ongoing self-promotion (by non-notable individual) makes matters worse Retardo (talk) 17:32, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It clearly fails WP:CORP. — ΛΧΣ21™ 06:00, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.