Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arlington Independent Media

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 21:22, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Arlington Independent Media[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. No coverage outside of local media and even that is limited. Rusf10 (talk) 01:41, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:56, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:56, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with WERA-LP. wumbolo ^^^ 13:39, 22 March 2018 (UTC) ~~Can't access the newly provided references. I can see that (at least) one ref explicitly talks about this in the title, so this would be a K from me. wumbolo ^^^ 17:26, 26 March 2018 (UTC)~~ Keep. Indepth coverage on WaPo. wumbolo ^^^ 18:38, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is (and has long been) a large and active outfit. An enormous amount of coverage - including details on various series that it produced over the 30+ years the station has operated - is available in back issues of the Washington Post. I added a handful of broader picture WaPo feature stories to the article which is, I think, now adequately sourced to pass notability. Also added a detailed profile of the station form the Boston Globe, detailing a major transition in 2003 that broadened both funding and mission. wumbolo ^^^ Did the TV station spawn the radio station, I seem to recall seeing that in one of the articles I read, or, is there some other relationship between the two? We should consider how best to connect the two articles.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:41, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I added a brief, sourced sentence and link to page, describing Arlington Media's creation of WERA-LP.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:50, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here are searches in WaPo on 'Arlington Community Television" (the station's original name): [1], and [[2]]. (I think these searches are open source.) INDEPTH coverage of various aspects of this station over 3 decades is not hard to find. It even shows up in books.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:33, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - several of the links are inaccessible, requiring a ProQuest account, so I'm basing my vote on the number and reputation of the sources. On a related note, I started marking the ProQuest links as dead on another AfD since they are inaccessible to most, but am wondering if there's a policy about not marking these types of links as dead? TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 20:41, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.