Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arlene Rosario Lindsay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:45, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Arlene Rosario Lindsay

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Magistrate judges simply are not notable by virtue of their position and there is nothing of significance that she has done in office that would grant notability. Nor does her service in the U.S. Attorney's Office grant notability. Delete. Safiel (talk) 06:01, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:08, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:08, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; No indication of notability in either her current role as MJ, or in her prior positions with the U.S. Attorney's Office or as an attorney for Suffolk County and the town of Huntington; as a part-time law school instructor; or anywhere else. TJRC (talk) 21:54, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Lindsay was previously the subject of an AFD here. That AFD, to delete a number of articles on individual magistrate judges, did not reach the merits of the individuals listed, and was closed on a procedural basis: each MJ needed to be considered on his or her merits. TJRC (talk) 21:58, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:59, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Wikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judges/Notability, the de facto notability guideline in effect for judge in the United States, states: "Magistrate judges and bankruptcy judges are appointed by the court of the district in which they sit. Such judges are not inherently notable, but holding such a position is evidence of notability that can be established by other strong indicia of notability". No other strong indicia of notability is present in this article. bd2412 T 13:55, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.