Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arise from Darkness (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:02, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arise from Darkness[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As per my previous nom, absolutely nothing has changed. fails WP:NFILM. The sources are spam/SEO work and PR pieces Praxidicae (talk) 11:40, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. –User 45 65 41 11:45, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:51, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a non-notable film. In my research, the Chicago Tribune source has a little bit about it, but I did not find any authoritative review of the film that would indicate that a standalone article is warranted. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 13:03, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not a notable film according to search results, this is all promotional. --Micky (talk) 03:23, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Blocked sockpuppet Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:55, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete notability fail. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 20:36, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.