Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arise (musician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 12:42, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arise (musician)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP which fails general notability guidelines as well as musician guidelines. Silverfish8088 (talk) 18:02, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 18:43, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-Too soon. Wgolf (talk) 22:15, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Not "Too soon", IMHO -- after listening to some of the music, I"ll go with "Unlikely ever". But that's not guideline-ish, so I'll also say the article is a wall of unencyclopedic chatter with nothing to back it up. Not notable. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 17:56, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for lacking notability. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:43, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -The sources are all useless for establishing anything. Between the quality of the music, and the high number of WP:SPAs at the article and at User:Nerdypunkkid/Arise, this smells like PR shenanigans. Grayfell (talk) 01:16, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.