Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ariel Moore
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedied per CSD-G12. Wholly unreferenced BLP also lacked any coverage in reliable sources which would be necessary to rewrite the article. لennavecia 14:04, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ariel Moore[edit]
- Ariel Moore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Ariel has no independent notability currently, she is only know for the time that she spent in the girl group Clique Girlz. The page was re-directed to the groups article when it was first created, but was recreated by IP users after she left the group. Frehley 00:47, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge anything sourced and salvageable back to Clique Girlz. If she manages to get any solo hits or notability, the article can be recreated, but it's far from certain that that will occur. Lankiveil (speak to me) 05:34, 16 May 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete as WP:VSCA. Having 2 videos on YouTube as a means of cashing in on your past does not make you independently notable. Eddie.willers (talk) 18:57, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I just noticed that the entire article is copied from the "About Me" section on Ariel's website (http://arielmoore.com/). So the article is currently a copyright violation. Frehley 23:05, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Her page has been edited so that it does not violate copyright laws. I do not know who created it in the first place and copy all of it but that is not how Wikipedia works. There should be no or very little problem with it. She is a upcoming independent artist, there should be no reason why she does not have her own page. - Allison 5-22-09—Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.212.142.246 (talk • contribs) 17:27, May 22, 2009 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:05, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable, badly fails to meet our WP:MUSIC standards; and of course by "upcoming" you mean "up and coming", a deprecated and invalid argument. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:34, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 06:15, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- G12 per Frehley. The Junk Police (reports|works) 01:42, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.