Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ariane M

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:26, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ariane M

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced speculation on a rocket which was never seriously considered. No coverage in any WP:RS I could find (search for "Ariane M" rocket -wikipedia). Misleading readers as to existence of this project. — JFG ^talk 14:20, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:39, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:39, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:42, 17 June 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Delete -- unsourced WP:CRYSTAL. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:08, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, technically it was mentioned in a 1991 study of possible future launchers. Never went further, though, and I couldn't find any RS commenting on the project. Not historically significant enough to deserve an article. — JFG ^talk 17:37, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:36, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:55, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.