Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argy DJ

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:48, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Argy DJ

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find anything that suggests this DJ meets WP:NBIO or WP:NMUSICIAN. A lot of the content and sources are simply verified through YouTube or AV content and don't go to notability. A lot of the content of the article specifies where the subject has performed, but the coverage only shows listings (not SIGCOV) or just videos, as previously mentioned. The one caveat that I have is that I am not able to find (and therefore assess) any sources that may be in Greek. Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:22, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Greece. Shellwood (talk) 16:05, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - If this article is kept, its title should be changed to Argy (DJ), because his stage name is simply Argy. He can't have that basic namespace though, due to the town of the same name. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 19:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In Greek there is only o)ne source. Clearly, Delete Pallikari ap' ta Sfakia 18:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC) (sock strike Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:30, 3 October 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 17:58, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (for now) - The notability situation is not as bad as it looks, because the article's creators didn't take the time to look for non-social media sources. He has a robust album review at [1]. He has generated some more media coverage in the form of interviews at [2], [3], [4], [5]. Unfortunately, those are all softball interviews from specialist webzines of unconfirmed reliability, so he remains largely unnoticed by the more reliable and objective music media so far. He might achieve WP's requirements for notability in the not-too-distant future but he has to get out of the esoteric underground first. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 19:25, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.