Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argentine presidential election, 2015
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:32, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Argentine presidential election, 2015[edit]
- Argentine presidential election, 2015 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL Barney the barney barney (talk) 19:43, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Currently undecided. I'd say delete as the article is, but apparently someone is working on it, judging by the construction templates. If somebody can write it properly (like this), I'd say keep. If it does get deleted, I don't have a problem with recreation in 2 years. King Jakob C2 20:37, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment You might want to also consider Argentine general election, 2015. The article already nominated is a cut & paste move from the original by a now blocked user. Number 57 21:18, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - WP:CRYSTAL covers this fairly clearly, as the nominator pointed out. OlYeller21Talktome 21:41, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:04, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:04, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: WP:CRYSTAL.-- Dewritech (talk) 07:55, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete redundant to Argentine general election, 2015, which is heading for keep. Number 57 13:20, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.