Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argentine Pila Dog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sources are clearly available; the article should be improved per WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM with them. (non-admin closure) Naypta ☺ | ✉ talk page | 14:02, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Argentine Pila Dog

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. At the time of nomination the article has five sources:

the first is used to cite a sentence about a completely different breed, the Chinese Crested Dog
the second is used to provide a translation for the word “Pila”, meaning hairless or naked
the third is an unverifiable book that is only used cite a number of dogs at a 2008 Argentine dog show, further a search of a number of ISBN search engines fails to find the work
the forth an archived link to a dead page of an obscure Argentine dog breed association, the Asociación Canina Argentina, the official national kennel club of Argentina is the Federación Cinológica Argentina
the fifth not only fails as RS but does not even mention these dogs.

A search of Google found nothing attributable. Cavalryman (talk) 04:35, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:49, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:49, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The name appears once on Google scholar here, with the name appearing once in that article with no further elaboration. The name appeares in Google books Xoloitzcuintli with the article stating that this dog first appeared in Argentina in the 1950s and implies that it is an imported Xoloitzcuintli but without actually saying that. Fails notability in my opinion: "Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail....is more than a trivial mention, William Harristalk 09:36, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Substantially more coverage exists in Spanish than in English, which is unsurprising for a local breed in a Spanish-speaking country, especially considering that this is a breed "in danger of extinction" (en peligro de extinción, first source linked below). The article on Spanish Wikipedia was a useful starting point for finding sources and coverage. I found a press release from the Argentine Canine Association announcing their official recognition of the breed and laying out the criteria of its breed standard. The Argentine Kennel Club, a member of the Pan-American Kennel Union, describes the perro pila as an "native Argentine breed". There is an article about the perro pila from La Gaceta Salta. In a publication by the La Plata National University there is a full page about the perro pila. There are a number of other results as well. Significant coverage clearly exists to sail past the GNG and justify the breed having its own article. CJK09 (talk) 18:14, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In view of the sources found by CJK09, I think that the subject meets GNG. aboideau^talk 21:04, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The above references from CJK09 - if included in the article - would support a WP:MOVE from "Argentine Pila Dog" to "Perro pila". William Harristalk 21:58, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Perro is Spanish for "dog"...; and given that ~~some~~all of these sources are in Spanish, well, this is, to put it simply, quite unsurprising... RandomCanadian (talk | contribs) 02:10, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The sources provided by CJK09 are uncontroversial and make this topic meet WP:GNG. RandomCanadian (talk | contribs) 02:12, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.