Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argentina women's national basketball team

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Non-admin closure. Chris (talk) 20:19, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Argentina women's national basketball team[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references and team does not seem notable (i.e. winning games, notable players, coaches, etc.) Whenaxis (talk) 22:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The fact it's the national team, represents some level of notabily. Not particularly successful, but still worth keeping for reference. scope_creep (talk) 00:14, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As a national team, most of their games are international and thus notable. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:36, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep It's a remarkably uninformative article that has "I couldn't care less about the subject" written all over it, but a national team is notable, regardless of whether it's got a winning record or not. Let's hope that it can be more than this-- 6th, 9th, 13th, 11nd (11nd?), 15th, 10th-- YAWN, go Argentina, rah. Rah. Rah. Mandsford 12:46, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for the reasons given above. Needs to be there, even though they're not particularly successful.Tris2000 (talk) 15:16, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As the creator of this article, when I create it I didn't concern about the success of the team. But if you really concern about that, Argentina women's national basketball team is currently in the top ten worldwide, and the men's national team is currently the number one. So I guess the article is significant and it has to exist. If you look most of other articles about women's national basketball teams, they all look similar about the content and dimension of the information.Oupals (talk) 16:12 18 August 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.