Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argentina–Kazakhstan relations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Closed a bit early per WP:SNOW. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:14, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Argentina–Kazakhstan relations

this is one of the most laughable combinations I've seen created by the obsessive creator. Kazakhstan govt says Due to a number of reasons, including geographical remoteness, weak investment potential, trade and economical relations with Argentina are insufficiently active. LibStar (talk) 07:48, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and per a Google search not turning up any references. Nick-D (talk) 08:40, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While I don't think that the notion of Argentina and Kazakhstan relations is quite as ridiculous as the nominator suggests, the Kazakh Foreign Ministry link in the article notes that the trade between the two nations is, as they put it, "insufficiently active". True, the foreign ministers of the two nations have met on a few occasions, but geography prevents any strong ties. Mandsford (talk) 12:51, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Renaissancee (talk) 12:54, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Mandsford. One (talk) 14:36, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, and the lack of reliable sources confirming anything. - Biruitorul ^Talk 14:37, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable, not likely to be found so. This article borders on being a mere dictionary entry. --BlueSquadronRaven 17:02, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included on the and Wikipedia:WikiProject International relations/Bilateral relations task force/Deletion page(s), which are related to this deletion discussion. User:Ikip

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.