Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arctic7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 03:25, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arctic7[edit]

Arctic7 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NCORP, coverage is limited to reprints of lightly edited press releases, but no significant independent analysis of Arctic7's operations. signed, Rosguill talk 19:59, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Companies, and Texas. signed, Rosguill talk 19:59, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep Coverage is a bit light, but several articles have detailed info. The Forbes Article is by senior contributor and is acceptable. These also help: gamedeveloper.com and gamesindustry.biz.Royal88888 (talk) 20:54, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    WP:FORBESCON says senior contributors are not reliable. signed, Rosguill talk 21:02, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. gamedeveloper.com and gamesindustry.biz articles are PR reprints. ~ A412 talk! 20:58, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify Putting aside that the current sourcing has a WP:PROMO tone, the article is WP:TOOSOON given the studio has no history and no product yet announced. As a WP:ATD, given the pedigree of the team, it is better to shelve this to a draft until there is notable coverage of something the studio is up to. VRXCES (talk) 05:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think there's any reason to expect the situation to change within the next 6 months so I'm not sure I see the motivation for a move to draftspace. If things change a few years down the line the page can always be undeleted. signed, Rosguill talk 13:56, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.