Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arcis Communications

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 18:41, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Arcis Communications[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems NN -- few refs discoverable. The article was created by an SPA, with a self-declared affiliation with the subject of the article (and the same name). Epeefleche (talk) 06:33, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Oh, look. Another advertising agency that thinks it should have a Wikipedia article. Much of this seems worthy of speedy deletion: The collective experience of this group includes decades of experience in journalism, public relations, branding, issues and crisis communications, marketing communications and design services....With a young team - and a network of freelance and agency partners around the South East Asian region - Arcis Communications is establishing itself as an integrated communications solutions provider in the areas of Public Relations, Branding and Marketing Communications. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:14, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 01:58, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not-entirely-blatant spam. Nyttend (talk) 18:44, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.