Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archie Raeside
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. v/r - TP 14:19, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Archie Raeside[edit]
- Archie Raeside (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a biography of a living person which is unsourced, and after some searching, does not appear to meet notability. The article is a bit vague on its assertion of notability. The subject is the author of one book for which I cannot find any critical reviews and is held in 17 libraries worldwide. That doesn't appear to be a work of significant impact. The article also states he is a regular contributor to Ireland's Eye. I'm assuming the wikilink in the article was done in error and that really refers to this magazine. I can find no evidence support the assertion that he is contributor although I have no reason to doubt the assertion. However, being a contributor to a minor magazine is not notable, and especially so when there is no sourcing. The rest of the positions he holds are not notable either. In searching for soruces, [1], and [2] are the best I am able to find. That us well short of what is needed to establish notability. Whpq (talk) 13:38, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for lack of notability, seems to be a mostly forgotten BLP.--Milowent • talkblp-r 13:15, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unable to find any coverage other than those found by the nominator both of which fall far short of significant coverage J04n(talk page) 21:52, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of notable mentions, I didn't see any on both Google and Yahoo. SwisterTwister talk 03:55, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.