Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arbitrary censorship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 21:02, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitrary censorship

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any evidence that this is a notable term. Plenty of sources write the words 'arbitrary censorship' but I don't see any discussing it as a concept. Sam Walton (talk) 09:11, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's a phrase that's used quite often (usually by people who oppose some action that vaguely resembles censorship), but it doesn't represent a distinct concept. It's just censorship that's arbitrary, and there's nothing more to it than that. Colapeninsula (talk) 14:34, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The "arbitrary" is just an opinion. We might as well have an article on "Stupid politician" or whatever. Steve Dufour (talk) 15:22, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Steve Dufour and my finding of no reasonable sources found for the term "arbitrary censorship" in a search engine.—Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 19:56, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.