Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arab League–Russia relations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Editors more or less agree that specific coverage of the subject doesn't quite meet GNG, and that relevant information can be included in myriad other articles about Russian relations with the countries of the Arab League. signed, Rosguill talk 02:40, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Arab League–Russia relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:UNSOURCED WP:OR/WP:SYNTH. Random WP:UNSOURCED "comparison" table data dump was already removed per Wikipedia talk:WikiProject International relations#Rfc on Country Comparison charts/tables. What remains does not really amount to anything: we've got a map, we've got an old 2009 picture of RF ex-president Medvedev and AL ex-sec-gen Moussa, we've got a completely WP:UNSOURCED and irrelevant section about the "Russian-Arab Business Council" that has nothing to do with the Arab League, but is instead a combo of 18 bilateral business councils of Russia with 18 Arab states (so not even all 22 member states of the Arab League), then a random See also section, then some more external links WP:PROMO for the irrelevant business councils, and some guy's WordPress blog, then two templates and two categories. That's it. This isn't an article. It's random vague stuff lumped together. In theory it is a legitimate topic, but we should WP:TNT this because the current mess isn't worth anyone's consideration. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 21:38, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:24, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:01, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.