Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aqua Blob
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wifione ....... Leave a message 09:09, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Aqua Blob[edit]
- Aqua Blob (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This game is at best a non-notable homebrew production, and at worst only a vague plan for a game that doesn't even exist yet. The article creator has added "check this every week for updates" to the article, suggesting that he plans to use Wikipedia as the primary host for information about the game. —Soap— 13:28, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not MySpace, as great as the homebrew/indie scene is developer blogs don't belong here. Someoneanother 13:49, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per nom. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 14:13, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Notability not established using independent sources. Appears to be marketing ploy. --Quartermaster (talk) 15:35, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Notability is not established and not likely to be provided. Stormbay (talk) 21:51, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can't find a thing even in non-RSes. I'm going with a hoax at the moment. Hobit (talk) 15:57, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per everyone. Edward321 (talk) 23:41, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Snow Delete - article cannot even pass WP:V, likely a hoax. Let it snow. --Teancum (talk) 17:21, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.