Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appoorva Muralinath

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) GSS (talk|c|em) 18:36, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Appoorva Muralinath[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBASKETBALL. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:58, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:07, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:07, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:07, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The sources in the article are enough to meet WP:GNG. Smartyllama (talk) 12:50, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:46, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete none of the sources show the substantial, more than routine coverage we need to show a person is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:24, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a sportsperson who has represented her country. The WP:NBASKETBALL criteria seem to make it impossible for a player from India to be considered notable, which can't be right. PamD 11:58, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Could use some cleaning up but meets guidelines. There are so many more less notable American athletes on Wikipedia not up for deletion Bwabwa7 (talk) 01:26, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Significant coverage in multiple reliable sources, meets gng.Jacona (talk) 15:23, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.