Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apologia Educational Ministries
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. howcheng {chat} 17:09, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
Doesn't assert the significance of this business. Delete. Catamorphism 00:23, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as non-notable business (group of people). Also delete Jay Wile. SycthosTalk 01:51, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, non-notable, self-promoting. Will 02:05, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete self-promoting. — Moe ε 03:04, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --NaconKantari 03:05, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as above. Blnguyen 04:24, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable corporation. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-18 09:15Z
- Delete, rubbish, basically vanity and nn-company. --Terence Ong 11:07, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as per nom, Sycthos and Will. Mike (T C)
20:22, 18 January 2006 (UTC) - Delete possibly speedy as lacking context (which country? what subject areas?) and in any case almost certainly vanispamcruftisement Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C]
AfD? 21:37, 18 January 2006 (UTC) - Delete Advertising, non-notable unverifiable. Lotusduck 21:57, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete As above. Adds no value to Wikipedia whatsoever. --kingboyk 23:35, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete if possible as A1 no context and A7 group of people with no notability asserted. Delete otherwise as per JzG. Stifle 17:08, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.