Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ApexTV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 15:35, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ApexTV

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only coverage from a reliable publication is several The Daily Dot pieces in similar formats, all from the same author. WP:BEFORE check revealed nothing else reliable (tabloids, sensationalism, etc.) Fails WP:GNG, WP:NWEB. –eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 19:10, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. –eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 19:10, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Barely found anything about the channel aside from the articles about its videos. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 10:45, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 04:56, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Seems to have gotten little more than a burst of coverage briefly after a time travel hoax, not enough to demonstrate lasting significance, or even a pass of WP:GNG. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:10, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.