Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anurag Chauhan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 01:36, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anurag Chauhan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article doesn't not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for biographies. Lekkala R Reddy (talk) 10:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 July 30. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:47, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:55, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:55, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:55, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep passes WP:GNG. Theroadislong (talk) 13:26, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep per WP:SKCRIT #1 - nominator has failed to advance any argument for deletion. Hug^syrup 13:52, 30 July 2019 (UTC) 'Rationale' now provided. I'll assess the article when I have more time and see if I still want to !vote. Hug^syrup 07:47, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The nominator has since added a reason. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:39, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The nominator's rationale was in fact there all along. Uncle G (talk) 15:48, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UTC)

Delete The person article doesn’t meet the notability guidelines. Used local sources for notability. The article must be deleted. Lekkala R Reddy (talk) 16:27, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article uses sources from The Times of India [1] which is not a local source. Theroadislong (talk) 16:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article looks more like a promotion of person. Violates WP:NPOV, also person fails WP:GNG. -- Harshil ^{want to talk?} 03:58, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Harshil169: It fails GNG how? That looks like a lot of reliable sources to me, but since I'm not an expert on Indian media, would you be so kind as to provide an analysis as to why you think it fails GNG? 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:07, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to gain better consensus. Note to admin that nominator is one of the delete !votes.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rollidan (talk) 21:30, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A search on google books and news yields several notable sources and mentions. Sources present on the article such as "The Times of India" are not local and cover mass area. Receiving an award from the United Nations passes WP:ANYBIO as well. AmericanAir88^(talk) 16:32, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep current sources seem sufficient to pass WP:GNG. Many are not local publications but I don't know why I bother to say that since local sources providing solid information are absolutely ok. Pichpich (talk) 22:58, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.