Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ants!!!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of TRS-80 games. Daniel (talk) 03:19, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ants!!![edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

With only one review (from a defunct magazine I am unable to locate a copy of online), and no other significant coverage I can find, I would say this article fails WP:NVG. pinktoebeans ^(talk) 22:21, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. pinktoebeans ^(talk) 22:21, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I feel that we can merge this into List of TRS-80 games, and put the review information in the "Notes" column, or in a footnote. BD2412 T 22:26, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep if more sources can be found, otherwise merge per BD2412 per WP:ATD and WP:PRESERVE. BOZ (talk) 04:20, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge It's got some references, which could contribute to List of TRS-80 games and/or 1979 in video games. Bibliopole5795 (talk) 08:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are 2 reviews, the one in external links is not cited inline. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 16:13, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Correct, I had forgotten that I found this additional review in 80 Micro: [1] BOZ (talk) 17:02, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please add any more relevant information to the article, it would be very useful in this assessment! pinktoebeans ^(talk) 19:03, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge per BOZ. It's hard to find WP:SIGCOV for games like this. It's at least verifiable and should be mentioned at least at a list. Jontesta (talk) 15:26, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 2 reviews mean multiple sources. That's not a lot, but considering what it is, a computer game from the days before the Internet, when not everyone and his brother could publish a game in a few minutes, that barely meets our standard for WP:GNG. --GRuban (talk) 16:57, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.