Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antony Mueller

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 05:26, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Antony Mueller

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article doesn't pass WP:NACADEMIC or WP:GNG. No in-depth coverage on reliable or independent sources. Wikipedia is not LinkedIn. SirEdimon ^Dimmi!!! 05:18, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. SirEdimon ^Dimmi!!! 05:18, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. SirEdimon ^Dimmi!!! 05:18, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. His Google Scholar profile shows too few citations for WP:PROF#C1, one self-published book with no reviews that I can find isn't going to pass WP:AUTHOR, and I can find no other suggestion of notability. That all said, copying and pasting the identical nomination statement on seven rapid-fire AfDs [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] doesn't make a strong case that the nominator has considered these cases individually or done the searching requested by WP:BEFORE. So although I tend to agree with the nominator in this case, I think a trout may still be due. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:11, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, concur with Eppstein this does not pass PROF. I don't see SIGCOV here either.--Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 07:16, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No WP:NPROF C1, a single book is thin for WP:NAUTHOR even if it had reviews; no other signs of notability. I hope the nominator did a careful WP:BEFORE on each article before batching them for AfD. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 18:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.