Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonio Perez Ayala
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Kurykh 01:40, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Antonio Perez Ayala (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
The subject of the articles does not seem to pass the biographical notability standard. I was not able to find any other information on the subject of the article (or even on any of his projects) while searching with the exception a small amount of information created by the author of this article on another wiki. This article was created by User:Aacini who created it the day after the subject of the article released a new esoteric programming language compiler based on Brainfuck and many of the edits serve to highlight this or link to data on the compiler. Since the compiler, BrainSub. The current article makes attempts to demonstrate notability (as was noted with the initial speedy was passed over) but does not succeed. As someone tenuously involved in the esolangs community, I do not think that the author of a compiler (even an improved one) necessarily qualifies as notable unless their project is very successful. This is not the case yet with Antonio Perez Ayala or BrainSub (IMHO). —mako๛ 14:22, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I had originally proposed this for a speedy deletion due to the notability requirement not being met. Before doing this I'd used Google to look at the areas where he had worked and apart from the BrainSub work which was promoted by this user on a different wiki, I couldn't find anything.--Mendors 20:07, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 00:14, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - It's poorly worded, but anyone who created all that work has to be notable. Is there anything in Spanish language databases? Bearian 21:14, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- While there are a lot of then, it's not clear to me that those projects are actually notable. I've looked for a few of them and not been able to find anything on them. They may be significant but they seem slightly esoteric. —mako๛ 18:34, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been mentioned on Talk:Brainfuck since the subjects notability seems to be based at least on part on his contributions in this community. —mako๛ 18:45, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable. --IanOsgood 19:26, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable. I too follow developments in esolang domain and I agree with mako๛ comments re: notability of Antonio or BrainSub. Alex Pankratov 19:53, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.