Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anton Sevarius
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect to Gargoyles (TV series). The Placebo Effect (talk) 18:01, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Anton Sevarius (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No secondary sources to establish notability or provide real world context Jay32183 (talk) 08:09, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Gargoyles (TV series). The only news article I could find was an interview with Tim Curry, the voice. --jonny-mt 08:44, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per jonny-mt. JuJube (talk) 09:59, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note Redirects can be created after an article is deleted and the need for a redirect is not a reason to preserve content that would otherwise be deleted. Jay32183 (talk) 21:11, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Also, if it's going to be redirected anywhere, it should be to List of Gargoyles characters. --64.136.26.235 (talk) 20:24, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note Redirects can be created after an article is deleted and the need for a redirect is not a reason to preserve content that would otherwise be deleted. Jay32183 (talk) 21:11, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- redirect to List of Gargoyles characters and expand slightly the short mention there. JoshuaZ (talk) 23:22, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteAlready listed at List of Gargoyles characters#Anton Sevarius; doesn't seem to be notable beyond inclusion on that page. JeremyMcCracken (talk) 05:41, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]- And the argument against redirection is? JoshuaZ (talk) 13:22, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I think people may want to Delete, then create the redirect, to reduce the temptation for fans to restore the content as soon as nobody's looking. Blast Ulna (talk) 14:19, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Change to redirect; JoshuaZ, I didn't think a redirect was needed, but on second thought, redirects are cheap, so might as well go with that. JeremyMcCracken (talk) 15:21, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I think people may want to Delete, then create the redirect, to reduce the temptation for fans to restore the content as soon as nobody's looking. Blast Ulna (talk) 14:19, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- And the argument against redirection is? JoshuaZ (talk) 13:22, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.