Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anton Chubenko

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anton Chubenko[edit]

Anton Chubenko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references since December 2016 even though the originating editor has continued to work on the article by adding spamish links. BLP Prod has been moved twice. Second one added accidently. No effort to source the article over the past two and a half year. Potential move to draft but it would not rescue it. scope_creepTalk 09:42, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. scope_creepTalk 09:42, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:51, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Neither WP:NOIMPROVEMENT nor WP:ATTP are good reasons for deletion. What matters is WP:NEXIST and WP:NPROF, but I'm not sure if he passes based on this standard since, whilst he has authored a lot of publications, it's not clear that any of these have had a significant impact.FOARP (talk) 13:29, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Appears to be a mid-level bureaucrat/administrator in the Ukrainian academia. Absolutely nothing in GoogleScholar. No evidence of passing either of WP:PROF, WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Nsk92 (talk) 01:27, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.