Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antigen Shift

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Antigen Shift

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Band whose claims to passing WP:NMUSIC are not reliably sourced. As always, it's not the claim to passing NMUSIC that gets a band in the door, but the depth of reliable source coverage in media that can be shown to properly verify that the claim to passing NMUSIC is actually true -- but there's not a single reference being cited here at all except their discogs.com entry (which is not a notability-supporting source), and I can't find anything better. Bearcat (talk) 23:23, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Update: An anonymous IP attempted to salvage this by adding new references, though they failed at adding useful ones that demonstrated the notability of this band: most of the new references are blogs, not reliable sources, and the only two that do count as reliable sources at all are both verifying stray facts about a different band this band once performed with, while completely failing to even namecheck this band's existence at all in the process. That's not how sourcing a band as notable works. Bearcat (talk) 18:59, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:34, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:34, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 10:23, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Article doesn't establish notability and I can't find anything of significance on Google. Subject is clearly not notable.Tuzapicabit (talk) 07:57, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Joe (talk) 15:13, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 01:26, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm weighing in after three re-listings and still no decision. Bottom line, no significant reliable sources, per nomination. Sources are small time and blogs. Further Googling turns up nothing. ShelbyMarion (talk) 19:12, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.