Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti'christ

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Das Ich. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 _{(ICE-T • ICE CUBE)} 10:45, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anti'christ[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources on page. Found this review from Exclaim! but nothing else. Redirect to the band's page. QuietHere (talk) 11:06, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Germany. QuietHere (talk) 11:06, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Notably, the German Wikipedia article has no sources either. BD2412 T 16:45, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Most of the albums that have been created by this band are not notable enough for wikipedia.`~HelpingWorld~`^(👽🛸) 05:39, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per Nom Fifthapril (talk) 15:50, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Das Ich, as is common procedure for a non-notable album from a notable band. The title is a possible search term (with this punctuation, at least). The Exclaim review seems to be one of the few pieces of reliable media coverage ever received by one of this band's albums, and it helps a little but it's still rather slight. Nobody else seems to have noticed the album. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 18:05, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Das Ich. Fails WP:NALBUM per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 00:16, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Das Ich. I do not see enough evidence of significant coverage in third-party, reliable sources to support this subject having a separate article, but I think a redirect is always more beneficial than outright deletion if a viable target article exists. Aoba47 (talk) 22:47, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.