Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Flynn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No opinion on recreation as a redirect. ansh 666 08:12, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Flynn

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially-toned page on an unremarkable entrepreneur and author. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions, WP:SPIP and / or not independent of the subject's company, which was deleted here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YouBar. Created as part of a promo walled garden. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:35, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 06:30, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:31, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:56, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 10:17, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Custom Nation. I can't find anything more than passing mentions for his YouBar product, and his name itself doesn't return any notable press coverage. His book would be the best place to redirect the article to. Newslinger (talk) 20:56, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nom's comment: I think a straight "delete" is preferable in this case. I'm not convinced that the book itself is notable; the article on it was created by Special:Contributions/Anonymity32 who is currently indef-blocked for sockpuppetry. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:02, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Fails WP:SIGCOV and also fails WP:NAUTHOR.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:44, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.