Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Cicali III

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:47, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Cicali III

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. Fails to establish notability. reddogsix (talk) 20:07, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:23, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No real claim of notability and no sources found in a Google search to support a claim. This source mentions him, but is certainly not about him. Alansohn (talk) 21:44, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete professional gamblers are rarely notable, no indicatio he is an exception.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:02, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG.--SamHolt6 (talk) 01:43, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SNOW. At 1/4 of a million on winnings, this person is ordinary. Bearian (talk) 23:27, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.