Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthonia Orji

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:47, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anthonia Orji

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Essentially unreferenced biography of a living person. References are links to Orji's About.me, Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn accounts. The only claim of notability is a nomination for a Shorty Award but since anyone with a Twitter account can nominate anyone else, this nomination is meaningless. Note that if this isn't deleted, it will need to be cleaned up since it's clearly biased and in part copy-pasted from [1]. Pichpich (talk) 16:55, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No significant coverage in reliable sources. None at all that I could find, actually. Having lots of Twitter followers is, in itself, not a persuasive claim to notability. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 20:19, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:44, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:44, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 11:41, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete After five pages of nothing but social networking links I have to conclude that notability isn't going to be established. Mangoe (talk) 16:53, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I waded through the top 100/10,800 Google hits for the exact name and found nothing that even remotely counts towards GNG. Definitely a leading Nigerian Twitter-er, but not the subject of multiple examples of substantial independently-published coverage, as nearly as I can determine. Carrite (talk) 17:17, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.