Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antara Nandy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:46, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Antara Nandy[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not finding any independent sources at all. Everything I can find is either an interview or probably from a press release ColinFine (talk) 18:01, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and India. Shellwood (talk) 18:07, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Influencer is a red flag, but this one might have a chance. [1] and [2], talking about her singing and viral song. Rolling Stone piece, looks like she was also on a TV show [3]. With the ones in the article, I think it's ok. Oaktree b (talk) 22:19, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
All three of those seem to be based on interviews, so not independent? ColinFine (talk) 13:29, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Based on artist confirmation Nandys20 (talk) 08:00, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Assam-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:06, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:09, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no music chart, noteworthy album or SIGCOV available. Perhaps TOOSOON for an article. Haueirlan (talk) 19:25, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:MUSICBIO. All of the sources are too closely connected to the subject, and therefore lack independence.4meter4 (talk) 04:26, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep GNews: [4] on Aaj Tak, [5] on Ei Samay Sangbadpatra and other significant coverage which are available on Google establish WP:GNG. Ginbopewz (talk) 13:06, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:09, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The contents are genuine and need not be deleted and certified by the artist herself. Incase needed , she or her office or her family can be connected thru their social media pages Nandys20 (talk) 07:59, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The information's are genuine and certified by the artist and their family and also substantiated by prestigious media houses who covered them. Nandys20 (talk) 08:02, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Nandys20 I am going to guess that your ID is representative of the topic. If it's true, then you need to make a disclosure of 'conflict of interest' and step away from this conversation. RPSkokie (talk) 12:38, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous relist failed to work properly, resulting in this discussion getting lost. Relisting a third time to get it back in the system
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 04:47, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I've seen playback singers survive AfD before but there's no notability in the sources presented in the article (generally very poor/non-RS/owned media) and the pieces offered up above are, indeed, interviews. There's precious little else out there. Incidentally, I note that Nandys20 is an SPA... Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:08, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am nandys20 (Antara Nandy myself) , any information mentioned is covered or available will all major national Indian media also or can be verified by me for myself. Nandys20 (talk) 12:15, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Promotional, inflating article. Apart from the comments above, many references are vague and incorrect. For example, She was also a scholar at the Centre for Cultural Resources and Training (CCRT) is supported by the homepage website of the CCRT. Agree with nom and others on sources. Also, dear @Nandys20: (if I may), you may want to read Why it's not the end of the world and Why an article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing. Thanks,User4edits (talk) 05:24, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.