Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antagonist (band) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Stifle (talk) 16:49, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Antagonist (band)[edit]

Nominating as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antagonist A.D., which deleted a cut and paste copy on the grounds of notability. I'm not convinced that the band is non-notable, but music is not my area of interest. If kept, the article should be moved to the current name. The previous AfD under this title was for an unrelated band. gadfium 21:50, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. —gadfium 00:25, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - but move to correct name Antagonist A.D.. Sources [1] and [2] are reliable, their coverage is non-trivial, and although partially based on a press release there are indications of independent jorunalism also. Two albums released, both in two countries, on genre specialist labels. Plus extensive touring in two countries [3]. passes general notability and WP:MUSIC clauses 1,4,7

dramatic (talk) 22:33, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, passes WP:MUSIC#C4 for the gigs in the States. While the Amplifier.co.nz & Muzic.net may be reliable sources, they are far from third party, since the bands themselves edit those profiles. Also support starting a new article under Antagonist A.D., and revert the history back to the American based Antagonist band. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 23:19, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:26, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:28, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:28, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.