Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annova Systems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:18, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Annova Systems

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The company seems not notable, and I couldn't find anything about it that proves notability. Ahmetlii (talk) 09:12, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ahmetlii (talk) 09:12, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Ahmetlii (talk) 09:12, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Ahmetlii (talk) 09:12, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: A WP:BEFORE should have detected the Openmedia product is the key element here which may be notable and which certainly has a WP:RS source in the article already.Djm-leighpark (talk) 01:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete on the basis that the company is not automatically notable because software it produced might be. I don't even think the software would pass WP:GNG. The article seems conflicted in the prose as to whether it's a historic or current company (either way, I agree it isn't notable enough). Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.