Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annie Butler (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:32, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Annie Butler[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

as per my previous nomination, simply being 2nd oldest person does not confer notability. no extensive coverage, years after her death [1]. LibStar (talk) 08:01, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Being the oldest or second oldest supercentenarian is a very hard thing to do. I think having a record of someone who was the second oldest person in the UK is not unreasonable. Many supercentenarians don't live long anyway--unlike Jean Calment of France who was a rarity. Having a brief article on the second oldest person is OK with me. But I would draw the line at the third oldest supercentenarian. --Artene50 (talk) 08:44, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
redirect to List of British supercentenarians Seasider91 (talk) 11:28, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:19, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep The references satisfy me. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 02:58, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This person passes WP:BASIC per: 1, 2, 3. Northamerica1000^(talk) 07:34, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.