Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Wyndham

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 23:09, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Wyndham

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as thoroughly non-notable actress. Quis separabit? 03:07, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per nomination. Her career never appeared to have household-name status. The article itself also has little going for it. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 03:15, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 04:34, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 04:34, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:43, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No RS. Seems to be fanpage. Agricola44 (talk) 13:29, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep pending WP:HEY. Article needs improvement, no question, but again, another pre-Google-age actor where there looks to be adequate number of roles and coverage. Mustn't confuse quality with notability. Montanabw^(talk) 21:07, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a tabloid, and that is the level of coverage we have here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:43, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.