Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Stedman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:30, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Stedman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial support. Contrary to what some editors think, appearing in a notable show/movie does not assign notability. reddogsix (talk) 23:31, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - horrendously written ("all things mommy") BLP by an SPA. Being on a TV show does not automatically convey notability. It's not entirely clear that this show she was in ever even actually aired, since the network it was on no longer exists as a broadcast TV network. Am I missing something? Bearian (talk) 19:23, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lepricavark (talk) 00:08, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 07:20, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 07:20, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 07:20, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane ^talk 08:03, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - In agreement with points already made AllanVolt (talk) 10:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:NACTOR. Several of her roles were in obscure children's programs. Rogermx (talk) 21:17, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.