Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Pride

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~ Amkgp 💬 01:51, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Pride[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I really hope I'm proved wrong on this one, as she seems an interesting character. It's borderline, hence it sitting in CAT:NN for 11 years. There is local (Pittsburgh) coverage, I'm just not convinced that is enough to meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO. Boleyn (talk) 07:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:51, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:51, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The nomination just seems to be some vague musing. See WP:ATD; WP:BEFORE and WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable activist who coined the phrase "Take back the night." Plenty of press coverage. Presumably even more in paper archives. pburka (talk) 11:28, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Coining "Take back the night" meets WP:ANYBIO criteria 2. Samsmachado (talk) 17:08, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In addition to the "Take Back the Night," she was responsible for legislation passed in Pennsylvania to protect the privacy of rape victims. I added info to the article and cleaned it up. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:29, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Adding my tuppence worth. Article has been updated sufficiently to prove notability. scope_creep^Talk 11:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Now clearly notable and well-sourced. --Lockley (talk) 15:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ (voted twice! duplicate vote removed) Instantly recognisable phrase. Now I know who coined it. scope_creep^Talk 09:46, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per WP:ANYBIO #2. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:41, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep seems to be plenty of sources for an article. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 17:56, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.