Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Mikusheva

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:25, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Mikusheva

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think this is a case of WP:TOOSOON. We usually don't include professors who are not full professors or without named chairs unless there is a specific reason to. agtx 16:26, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I thought about this for quite some time before creating the article. However, Wikipedia:Notability (academics)#Criteria says that academics are considered notable if, "2. The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level." By this criteria, Mikusheva DEFINITELY passes the notability test because she won the Elaine Bennett Research Prize, a highly prestigious academic award at the national level. EAWH (talk) 17:20, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 16:40, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 16:40, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:00, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:01, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. GS h-index of 10 may just pass WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:10, 30 July 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Truly Weak keep. It's certainly a "by the skin of the teeth" call, but EAWH is correct; the academics guideline is explicit that even that one high profile award is sufficient to establish notability. The Elaine Bennett Research Prize is not the absolute highest of profile awards, but probably sufficient to the "highly prestigious bar". There's the additional h-index evidence suppline by Xxanthippe as well, but as WP:NACADEMIC makes clear, that is the weakest possible evidence for just one prong the notability analysis and is to be treated with skepticism. Still, looking at the entire package of this Harvard-trained MIT faculty member with significant publications in major journals of her field, I have to say she just barely gets through by the smallest possible margin. Snow ^{let's rap} 23:58, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.