Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Biolik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Daniel (talk) 00:13, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Biolik[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod declined in April but marked for notability concerns 10 years ago. Ambassadors are not inherently notable. No significant coverage to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 22:43, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Bilateral relations, and Canada. LibStar (talk) 22:43, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Mongolia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Russia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:32, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral but drawing attention to J. Gregory Goldhawk, her successor. Espresso Addict (talk) 01:40, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Now sufficiently notable, thanks to the well-sourced improvements Victuallers has been making.--Ipigott (talk) 10:23, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the additions made appear to satisfy GNG. Wizardman 01:58, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.