Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann Gottesman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:40, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ann Gottesman[edit]
- Ann Gottesman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Finishing nomination procedure started by User:DreamGuy. Unsure of reason for nomination. WWGB (talk) 23:23, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 23:48, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Insufficient notability to meet guidelines for inclusion. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:51, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete maybe even snowball, no google hits to speak of. Although it throws up quite a few for Ann Gottesman, alawyer,maybe we should be including her? Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 09:23, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:09, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete self-published author, books not even in worldCat. DGG (talk) 03:57, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or even snowball. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 11:36, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.