Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjur Osmanovic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus is that he does not meet the criteria for inclusion at this time PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 01:54, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anjur Osmanovic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

User:Soccer-holic attempted to nominate this page for deletion, but failed to complete the nomination. No recommendation on my part. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:14, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Twinkle seems to have messed up the nomination process once again, sorry. I am nominating this article because of the following:

Article about a youth football player who (obviously) has not played in a professional league yet, thus failing WP:NFOOTBALL. There is no guarantee that the player will ever reach notability, thus a case of WP:CRYSTAL. --Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 19:24, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 19:27, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. He clearly fails all relevant notability guidelines. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:45, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 22:50, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 14:52, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Save Yesterday (17th Feb 2011) the Anjur Osmanovic wikipedia page was visited 369 times - this figure indicates that this subject is of significant interest to Wikipedia users and on this ground alone should not be deleted.

Finnish Gas (Finnish Gas 06:48, 18 February 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Delete Youth players at notable clubs aren't notable. Stu.W UK (talk) 04:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Save~~ I am well aware about the issue of notability and the rules and guidelines that we follow. The point that I am raising is that there is considerable interest in this topic and therefore question whether we should be supporting blanket deletions when Wikipedia users clearly desire and are searching for information on a topic. There has already been quite distinct coverage in the media - this is likely to grow in the forthcoming months.

Evidence of the level of interest is in this Wikipedia page is provided below:

15th Feb - 63 views (some reflecting my preparations)
16th Feb - 54 views
17th Feb - 369 views
18th Feb - 374 views
19th Feb - 350 views
20th Feb - 351 views
21st Feb - 349 views
22nd Feb - 330 views

NB: In terms of quality the article is very poor but would be much improved if there was recognition that this is a useful and meaningful topic.

Finnish Gas (Finnish Gas 15:46, 20 February 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Please don't !vote more than once -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:04, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.