Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjum Lucknowi (poet)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Materialscientist (talk) 12:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anjum Lucknowi (poet)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just declined this at AFC, the subject clearly doesn’t meet WP:GNG,no sources ,poorly written and borderlines A7 Megan☺️ ^{Talk to the monster} 15:33, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Megan☺️ ^{Talk to the monster} 15:33, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Megan☺️ ^{Talk to the monster} 15:33, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable and fails WP:POET as well as WP:ANYBIO ~ Amkgp 💬 15:40, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete A7 I don't see any significance or nay level of notability to meet the standard of WP:GNG. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 18:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - It's also good to note that a draft of this exact article also already exists at Draft:Anjum lucknowi. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 18:27, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom as unsourced, non-notable BLP. --Lockley (talk) 18:49, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unsourced WP:GNG failure Fiddle Faddle 20:52, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable subject clearly fails general notability criteria, in particular it fails to satisfy WP:POET. Previously deleted under G5. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:47, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note that an editor is busy moving this article around. I and one other have placed it back in article space since the deletion discussion is already in progress. May I suggest a SNOW verdict on this article, please, and a speedy close? Fiddle Faddle 07:58, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Snow delete - can we bundle the near-identical Anjum lucknowi in with this? I'm not sure if it's ineptitude by an inexperienced editor or an attempt at gaming the system, but it might be worth considering salting the page. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 08:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I concur with the bundling, and a wide distribution of salt in draft and main space Fiddle Faddle 09:21, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Might we also note Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Anjum lucknowi and consider whether it should run independently of this or be closed at the same time, please? Fiddle Faddle 11:15, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The editor is really being disruptive and tying to evade deletion of the article. Has just moved the article above back to draft space after noting it was tagged for speedy deletion per A10 Megan☺️ ^{Talk to the monster} 09:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment WP:NOTHERE They have just added implausible references to random facts! See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Khan tabrez suggestive of LTA since April 2020 Fiddle Faddle 10:54, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.