Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anita Thigpen Perry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:43, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anita Thigpen Perry

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Finishing the nomination on behalf of an IP user (User:86.40.214.5), who wrote in their edit summary: "Nominated for deletion; because notability as a relation of a politician is not inherited, it's a biography with one external link that's not independent, not reliable and certainly not multiple." I am neutral myself at this time. Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:35, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I am not a fan, but she's got hundreds of thousands of Ghits, and a nursing school is named in her honor because of her Philanthropy. This we can rescue. Bearian (talk) 00:52, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: A school is named after her. Joe Chill (talk) 02:41, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Snow keep, spouses of US governors usually become notable despite themselves. Plenty of sources here. -- Banjeboi 15:31, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I have to go with Joe. - Ret.Prof (talk) 14:33, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Easy Keep --Milowent (talk) 21:21, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability is not inherited, and the article is completely unsourced. Either source it, with multiple sources offering non-trivial coverage of her (not her husband) or delete it. Unit Anode 18:27, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.