Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anita Rodriguez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. SarahStierch (talk) 23:25, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anita Rodriguez[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable artist. Article was apparently created by the subject's daughter, copied and pasted directly from her website, so I stubbed and tagged. A Google search doesn't turn up any third-party sources. -Math nerd 101 14:45, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:09, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:09, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:10, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - Her work is in the collection of the New Mexico Capitol Collection of Art, which is a US State collection.Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 00:53, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per Ethicoaestheticist, assuming the facts can be corroborated. She's also exhibited in Taos, New Mexico and Charleston, South Carolina, both well-known art markets. Bearian (talk) 19:25, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.