Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anita Brolly
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:40, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Anita Brolly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Makeup artist for a handful of productions. Doesn't appear to be notable per WP:BIO. There doesn't appear to be any sources for a biographical article available...only the 5-10 credits as a makeup artist and/or hair stylist. Contested prod. Onorem♠Dil 19:21, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Being the makeup artist for 8 movies does not fulfill the requirements for bios of entertainers or actors. No evidence of significant awards, or notability demonstrated from third party sources, or that she has made groundbreaking advances in her field, therfore fails WP notability requirements, and should be deleted. Theseeker4 (talk) 19:42, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Nor should it fulfill these requirements. A makeup artist is neither an entertainer nor an actor. I believe other rules apply, though I have not found which those would be yet. - Mgm|(talk) 09:30, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:44, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:44, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non notable. Mentions are trivial. So there are no non trivial independent sources. Obina (talk) 12:04, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - being employed within the film industry is not equivalent to having notability within the field. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 16:43, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.