Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anisha Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus DGG ( talk ) 03:16, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anisha Singh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement, and I am not seeing anything better. Passing mentions and press release/PR-like coverage in minor niche zines and trade journals, mostly based on interviews which are usually not the most reliable sources (WP:INTERVIEW). I don't think she passes BIO. Thoughts? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:50, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I concur, this is a blatant sales listing for a person whose career involves it exactly, and the company, note, is also at AfD with advertising blatancy so they were clearly part of the same advertising campaign. WP:NOT applies and we use it. SwisterTwister talk 06:08, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:45, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:45, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-Even after removing all the utter promotion, the article cleanly fails the notability test.Almost all references are WP:INTERVIEW which are usually a bad source for demonstrating WP:NOTABILITY.Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 11:32, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.