Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anina (model)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Whether she has a "cult following" is irrelevant as long as she passes WP:GNG. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:33, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Anina (model)[edit]
- Anina (model) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable, WP:BLP. Posted for nominator Domenico.y per this edit. JFHJr (㊟) 23:49, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Not notable, WP:BLP Domenico.y (talk) 02:46, 3 October 2011 (UTC) Domenico.y[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 22:48, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 22:48, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Notable or not, the references and available online sources do not assert notability for Wikipedia. Some of the IP edits in 2007 are clearly by the subject herself. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:29, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Online sources such as Wired.Com confirm notability for being a fashion model tech-geek[1], and she is apparently has a huge following in China.[2][3] Rednevog (talk) 19:32, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:32, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:NMODEL for having a cult following in China. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:26, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: regarding the cult following, the article reads, "She has a huge following in China," supported by: 1) this passing statement "Anina – a Paris-based American model who, with her cartoonish dress and love of all things tech, is apparently building a huge following in China." 2) this Q&A with the subject. The language ("is apparently building") of the first cite doesn't entirely support the contention, and the Q&A with a Chinese reporter talking about China doesn't have anything about her following there. If notability will rest in any part on a huge cult following, are there other sources to show it? I googled a bit in English and Chinese (阿妮娜) and didn't find much about her huge following. JFHJr (㊟) 01:52, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Just having a 'cult following' does not satisfy the rigour of Wikipedia policies for inclusion and verifiable reliable sources.. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:21, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Apparently she is a top model in China according to this article by China Daily which featured her [4]. I've added that source to the article, as well as another reliable source citation from an article that featured her in the French language on Clubic here [5]. The article itself still needs to be trimmed to remove promotional materials and uncited claims, but she does appear to pass WP:GNG. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:01, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: A lot of the claims in this article are not referenced. 'Cult following' by who and I checked and it did not fulfill the criteria of verifiable reliable sources and some of the sources do not meet WP:BLP because they are not referenced, therefore Not notable. Domenico.y (talk) 15:36, 12 October 2011 (UTC) Domenico.y[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.