Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animesh Nandan Sahay

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star Mississippi 04:26, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Animesh Nandan Sahay[edit]

Animesh Nandan Sahay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable CEO or Engineer. Possible COI. Misterrrrr (talk) 10:54, 13 February 2023 (UTC) - WP:SOCKSTRIKE - Beccaynr (talk) 18:47, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Economic Times, The Washington Post and The Hindu Businessline have covered his work. Why is this not considered impactful? Google scholar has researchers not businessmen. Above are major media internationally. This person awarded First Achiever of Odisha award by the Times group, why is that non-notable work? Sugudoo (talk) 00:51, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: In addition to above media, also added coverage in The Hindu (1,415,792 Daily (as of December 2019)) along with citation in The Times of India (1,590,784 (as of June 2022)).
  1. "Achievers felicitated by TOI in Bhubaneswar". The Times of India. June 14, 2015. ISSN 0971-8257. Retrieved February 14, 2023.
  2. https://www.thehindu.com/sport/hockey/hi-ropes-in-mcl-as-principal-partner-for-champions-trophy/article6567615.ece
Sugudoo (talk) 01:30, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relist to consider sources brought up in the discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 15:53, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More opinions on the sources provided are welcome.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timothytyy (talk) 00:12, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per lack of notability and coverage. I checked the page sources, as well as did my web-search. Suitskvarts (talk) 20:28, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.